Getting Past Hume in the Philosophy of Social Science

In Phyllis McKay Illari Federica Russo (ed.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A realist, powers‐based metaphysics is very much on the table in contemporary metaphysics, and is beginning to take hold in philosophy of mind and philosophy of science. On this picture, causality is (roughly) a matter of the powers that things have to effect change(s) in other things. The realist view is at odds with every version of Humeanism, according to all of which causation is not, in the end, about the exercise of powers, but rather, in one way or another, about regular sequences. The chapter has two parts. In the first part the chapter considers how it is that analytic philosophers of social science have been able thus far to side‐step the critique of Humeanism. In the second part, the chapter considers how analytic philosophy of social science might look different, were Humeanism no longer to be its tacit metaphysics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
51 (#91,726)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Groff
St. Louis University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references