- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Couples’ Dialogue Orientations
Abstract
Walton has distinguished among several sorts of argumentative dialogues. This paper continues the project of measuring individuals’ self-reported preferences for each dialogue type. In this study, long-term romantic couples were surveyed to examine if their dialogue preferences matched, and whether their preferences were, in turn, related to their relational satisfaction.Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary on: Ionana Cionea, Dale Hample, and Edward Fink's "Dialogue types: A scale development study".Douglas Walton - unknown
A test of the investment model among asexual individuals: The moderating role of attachment orientation.Alexandra Brozowski, Hayden Connor-Kuntz, Sanaye Lewis, Sania Sinha, Jeewon Oh, Rebekka Weidmann, Jonathan R. Weaver & William J. Chopik - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Gendering desire in speed-dating interactions.Neill Korobov - 2011 - Discourse Studies 13 (4):461-485.
Assortative mate preferences for height across short-term and long-term relationship contexts in a cross-cultural sample.Katarzyna Pisanski, Maydel Fernandez-Alonso, Nadir Díaz-Simón, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Adrian Sardinas, Robert Pellegrino, Nancy Estevez, Emanuel C. Mora, Curtis R. Luckett & David R. Feinberg - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Intervening to Strengthen Intimate Relationships: Moderators and Mediators in Three Randomized Controlled Trials.Williamson Hannah Camille - unknown
The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument.J. Anthony Blair - 1997 - Argumentation 12 (2):325-339.
Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences. [REVIEW]Mohammed Abdellaoui, Olivier L’Haridon & Corina Paraschiv - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (2):175-191.
Pour des orientations renouvelées au sein de la recherche.Jean-Georges Lemaire - 2007 - Dialogue: Families & Couples 174 (4):77-84.
Rational Responsibility for Preferences and Moral Responsibility for Character Traits.Donald W. Bruckner - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:191-209.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-12-20
Downloads
7 (#603,698)
6 months
2 (#1,816,284)
2016-12-20
Downloads
7 (#603,698)
6 months
2 (#1,816,284)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
References found in this work
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University of Toronto Press.
Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments.Dale Hample, Ben Warner & Dorian Young - 2008 - Argumentation 23 (1):21-37.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-tsllw uwo