Coordinatisation and canonical bases in simple theories

Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):293-309 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we discuss several generalization of theorems from stability theory to simple theories. Cherlin and Hrushovski, in [2] develop a substitute for canonical bases in finite rank, ω-categorical supersimple theories. Motivated by methods there, we prove the existence of canonical bases (in a suitable sense) for types in any simple theory. This is done in Section 2. In general these canonical bases will (as far as we know) exist only as “hyperimaginaries”, namely objects of the forma/Ewhereais a possibly infinite tuple andEa type-definable equivalence relation. (In the supersimple, ω-categorical case, these reduce to ordinary imaginaries.) So in Section 1 we develop the general theory of hyperimaginaries and show how first order model theory (including the theory of forking) generalises to hyperimaginaries. We go on, in Section 3 to show the existence and ubiquity of regular types in supersimple theories, ω-categorical simple structures and modularity is discussed in Section 4. It is also shown here how the general machinery of simplicity simplifies some of the general theory of smoothly approximable (or Lie-coordinatizable) structures from [2].Throughout this paper we will work in a large, saturated modelMof a complete theoryT. All types, sets and sequences will have size smaller than the size ofM. We will assume that the reader is familiar with the basics of forking in simple theories as laid out in [4] and [6]. For basic stability-theoretic results concerning regular types, orthogonality etc., see [1] or [9].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Geometry of Forking in Simple Theories.Assaf Peretz - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):347 - 359.
Supersimple ω-categorical groups and theories.David M. Evans & Frank O. Wagner - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):767-776.
Simplicity, and stability in there.Byunghan Kim - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):822-836.
Simplicity, and Stability in There.Byunghan Kim - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):822-836.
On countable simple unidimensional theories.Anand Pillay - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1377-1384.
Canonical bases in excellent classes.Tapani Hyttinen & Olivier Lessmann - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (1):165-180.
On omega-categorical simple theories.Daniel Palacín - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (7-8):709-717.
Supersimple $\omega$-Categorical Groups and Theories.David Evans & Frank Wagner - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):767-776.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#190,912)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Theories without the tree property of the second kind.Artem Chernikov - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (2):695-723.
Simplicity in compact abstract theories.Itay Ben-Yaacov - 2003 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 3 (02):163-191.
Lovely pairs of models.Itay Ben-Yaacov, Anand Pillay & Evgueni Vassiliev - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 122 (1-3):235-261.
Generic pairs of SU-rank 1 structures.Evgueni Vassiliev - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 120 (1-3):103-149.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Simple theories.Byunghan Kim & Anand Pillay - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):149-164.
Simple unstable theories.Saharon Shelah - 1980 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 19 (3):177.

Add more references