An attempted clarification of frustration theory

Psychological Review 75 (2):173-176 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0025464

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Frustration theory: Restatement and extension.Norman R. F. Maier - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (6):370-388.
Frustration theory and partial reinforcement effects: The acquisition-extinction paradox.James J. Hug & Abram Amsel - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (4):419-421.
"Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding": Clarification.Irving Biederman - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (1):2-2.
Criteria of frustration.S. H. Britt & S. Q. Janus - 1940 - Psychological Review 47 (5):451-470.
On frustration and the PRE.R. Wilton - 1967 - Psychological Review 74 (2):149-150.
The role of frustration in social movements.N. R. F. Maier - 1942 - Psychological Review 49 (6):586-599.
II. Non-aggressive reactions to frustration.Robert R. Sears - 1941 - Psychological Review 48 (4):343-346.
I. The frustration-aggression hypothesis.N. E. Miller - 1941 - Psychological Review 48 (4):337-342.
IV. The frustration-aggression hypothesis and culture.Gregory Bateson - 1941 - Psychological Review 48 (4):350-355.
Reaction to frustration—a critique and hypothesis.S. Stansfeld Sargent - 1948 - Psychological Review 55 (2):108-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references