Regressive Federalism, Rights Reversals, and the Public’s Health

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 50 (2):375-379 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the United States emerges from the worst public health threat it has ever experienced, the Supreme Court is poised to reconsider constitutional principles from bygone eras. Judicial proposals to roll back rights under a federalism infrastructure grounded in states’ interests threaten the nation’s legal fabric at a precarious time. This column explores judicial shifts in 3 key public health contexts — reproductive rights, vaccinations, and national security — and their repercussions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public Health and the Law.James G. Hodge, Lexi C. White & Andrew Sniegowski - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):690-695.
Overcoming managed care - regulatory chaos through a restructured federalism.John D. Blum - 2001 - Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine 11 (2):327-350.
Nationalizing Public Health Emergency Legal Responses.James G. Hodge - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (2):315-320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-29

Downloads
9 (#1,270,032)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Legal Interventions to Counter COVID-19 Denialism.James G. Hodge, Jennifer L. Piatt & Leila Barraza - 2021 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):677-682.

Add more references