A proofless proof of the Barwise compactness theorem

Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):597-602 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We prove a theorem (1.7) about partial orders which can be viewed as a version of the Barwise compactness theorem which does not mention logic. The Barwise compactness theorem is easily equivalent to 1.7 + "Every Henkin set has a model". We then make the observation that 1.7 gives us the definability of forcing for quantifier-free sentences in the forcing language and use this to give a direct proof of the truth and definability lemmas of forcing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Algebraic Proof of the Barwise Compactness Theorem.Carol Karp & Jon Barwise - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (2):335-335.
Steel forcing and Barwise compactness.S. D. Friedman - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 22 (1):31.
Steel forcing and barwise compactness.Sy D. Friedman - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 22 (1):31-46.
Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's theorem and the effectiveness of Gleason's theorem.Ehud Hrushovski & Itamar Pitowsky - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):177-194.
Random variables and integral logic.Karim Khanaki & Seyed-Mohammad Bagheri - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (5):494-503.
Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's theorem and the effectiveness of Gleason's theorem.Itamar Pitowsky - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):177-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#109,065)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references