Three Model-Theoretic Constructions for Generalized Epstein Semantics

Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):1023-1032 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper introduces three model-theoretic constructions for generalized Epstein semantics: reducts, ultramodels and $\textsf {S}$ -sets. We apply these notions to obtain metatheoretical results. We prove connective inexpressibility by means of a reduct, compactness by an ultramodel and definability theorem which states that a set of generalized Epstein models is definable iff it is closed under ultramodels and $\textsf {S}$ -sets. Furthermore, a corollary concerning definability of a set of models by a single formula is given on the basis of the main theorem and the compactness theorem. We also provide an example of a natural set of generalized Epstein models which is undefinable. Its undefinability is proven by means of an $\textsf {S}$ -set.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-11

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Krzysztof Krawczyk
Jagiellonian University

References found in this work

Relatedness and implication.Richard L. Epstein - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (2):137 - 173.
Philosophical basis of relatedness logic.Douglas N. Walton - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (2):115 - 136.
Relatedness in intensional action chains.Douglas N. Walton - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (2):175 - 223.
S Is Constructively Complete.Francesco Paoli - 1996 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:31-47.

View all 8 references / Add more references