I like you may actually implicate ‘I love you’: A reconsideration of some scalar implicatures

In Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone (eds.), Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Issues in Linguistics. Springer. pp. 33-52 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A scalar implicature is a Quantity-based conversational implicature that is derived from a set of salient contrastive alternatives usually linearly ordered in semantic or informational strength such as a Horn scale. It is dependent on the non-use of the semantically or informationally stronger alternatives that could have been used in the same set. A typical example is that the use of the semantically weak existential quantifier some implicates ‘not the semantically stronger universal quantifier all’. But this is not always the case. In this article, I discuss three ‘marked’ cases of scalar implicature in a number of different languages: the use of ‘I like you’ to implicate ‘I love you’ in Chinese, the use of a general noun such as olona ‘person’ to refer to the speaker’s husband or her boy’s father in Malagasy, and the use of a semantically weak scalar expression to imply the meaning of its stronger alternatives in a face-threatening context in Chinese, Japanese, and English. Following Huang : 25–39, 2020), I call this type of marked scalar implicature, which has received very little attention in the literature ‘non-canonical scalar implicature’. I point out that the use of ‘non-canonical’ scalar implicature is implicated in a classical way, with maximum theoretical parsimony, from Grice’s co-operative principle and its component maxims of conversation. Finally, I provide a novel neo-Gricean pragmatic analysis of non-canonical scalar implicatures, combining both Horn’s and Levinson’s Q- and R/I-principles. In my account, two aspects of non-canonical scalar implicature are distinguished: epistemic and non-epistemic. For generating the non-epistemic aspects of non-canonical scalar implicature ‘from weak to not stronger’, Horn scales and the Q-principle are invoked. On the other hand, for engendering the epistemic aspects of non-canonical scalar implicatures ‘from weak to stronger‘, a scale such as is treated as forming an Atlas-Levinson rather than a Horn scale and the computation of it is subject to the R/I-principle. Therefore, a more accurate term for a non-canonical scalar implicature may be ‘Q-scalar/I-implicature’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
11 (#1,316,815)

6 months
5 (#1,293,586)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references