Authors
Robert C. Hughes
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Many scholars believe that it is procedurally undemocratic for the judiciary to have an active role in shaping the law. These scholars believe either that such practices as judicial review and creative statutory interpretation are unjustified, or that they are justified only because they improve the law substantively. This Article argues instead that the judiciary can play an important procedurally democratic role in the development of the law. Majority rule by legislatures is not the only defining feature of democracy; rather, a government is democratic to the extent to which it provides egalitarian forms of political participation. One such form of participation can be the opportunity to influence the law through the courts, either directly by participating in a case or indirectly by advocating litigation. Arguing from several examples, this Article shows that judicial decision-making allows different voices to be heard that may not necessarily have influence or power in majoritarian legislative structures or popular initiatives. Giving citizens the opportunity to change, to preserve, and to obtain authoritative clarification of the law through the courts can thus make a government procedurally more democratic.
Keywords judicial review  democratic theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Judicial Review Undemocratic?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):897-915.
Proceduralism, Judicial Review and the Refusal of Royal Assent.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2):379-400.
Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.Donald Bello Hutt - 2017 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 64 (152):77-103.
Tracking Justice Democratically.Føllesdal Andreas - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):324-339.
Tracking Justice Democratically.Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):324-339.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-26

Total views
83 ( #128,249 of 2,445,270 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #35,520 of 2,445,270 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes