Is Philosophy a ‘Theory of Everything’?: G. M. K. Hunt


Abstract
When Wittgenstein moved from Manchester to Cambridge he was following a path from the study of the natural sciences to the study of philosophy which was then not unusual, and has since become increasingly common. Russell had preceded him in that intellectual emigration and many more were to follow. Of the three philosophy departments I have been in, two were headed by natural scientists. Both my research supervisors in philosophy were natural scientists. Less surprising, but still significant, a considerable proportion of Presidents of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science were originally trained as natural scientists. Yet it is a subject still unrecognized by the Royal Society. The editors of both the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and the journal Analysis were both originally natural scientists. Eminent scientists seem to feel impelled to discuss there own subjects in a wider context of philosophy. Bohr, Schrodinger, Kilmister, Hoyle, Hawking and Penrose, are but a few from a long list.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100002368
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,395
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Philosophy a 'Theory of Everything'?G. M. K. Hunt - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 33:219-231.
On Materialism in Natural Science.Hu Wen-Keng - 1974 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 5 (3):35-68.
Nature's Experiments and Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences.M. S. Morgan - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (3):341-357.
Nature’s Experiments and Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences.Julie Zahle - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (3):341-357.
Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change.Joseph LaPorte - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Brain, Mind, Man, and Society: Naturalism with a Human Face.Daniel Andler - 2006 - In D. Andler, M. Okada & I. Watanabe (eds.), Reasoning and Cognition. pp. 77--84.
Paradigms and Possibilities.Graham McFee - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):58 – 77.
Astronomy and Experimentation.Michelle Sandell - 2010 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14 (3):252-269.
Introductory Note by the Editors of "Voprosy Filosofii".[author unknown] - 1972 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10:203-205.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
28 ( #337,002 of 2,291,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #232,253 of 2,291,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature