Argumentation and Persuasion in Classical Chinese Literature

In Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 21-48 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyses the two main rhetorical techniques of “argumentation” and “persuasion” employed in politico-philosophical debates recorded in early Chinese argumentative texts of the Warring States period. Through the analysis of pertinent case studies drawn from the received literature, the contribution explores the formal, structural, and grammatical features of these techniques, with attention paid to the wide selection of rhetorical and literary devices they make use of. It also further provides an overview of the historical and socio-cultural background against which such techniques developed among so called “wandering persuaders”, who were travelling from court to court to offer their services as political advisors and diplomats to the local rulers of the time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The “white horse is not horse” debate.Lisa Indraccolo - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (10):e12434.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references