Speech and action

Legal Theory 7 (2):179-201 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The fundamental tenet of the liberal conception of free speech is the principle of content neutrality, which Mill espoused in claiming that 1 On this view, the immorality, the falsity, and even the harmfulness of an opinion are not good reasons to censor it. s persuasion may be, not only of the falsity but of the pernicious consequenceslose their immunitys justification can be doubted. But I will not discuss these issues, on which there is already an immense literature, any further here

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
53 (#293,513)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Your word against mine: the power of uptake.Lucy McDonald - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):3505-3526.
Failing to do things with words.Nicole Wyatt - 2009 - Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):135-142.
Advising as inviting to trust.Edward S. Hinchman - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):355-386.
Saying and Doing: Speech Actions, Speech Acts and Related Events.Gruenberg Angela - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):173-199.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references