Humpty Dumpty and the “Sneaky O” Proposition

New Scholasticism 45 (4):590-599 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas197145460

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Humpty Dumpty and the “Sneaky O” Proposition.Theodore E. James - 1971 - New Scholasticism 45 (4):590-599.
The “Sneaky O” Proposition.F. F. Centore - 1970 - New Scholasticism 44 (4):600-602.
Duns Scotus and the Self-Evident Proposition.Brennan Van Hook - 1962 - New Scholasticism 36 (1):29-48.
Russell’s Doctrine of the Logical Proposition.Hugh J. Tallon - 1939 - New Scholasticism 13 (1):31-48.
Wittgenstein and James.Matthew Fairbanks - 1966 - New Scholasticism 40 (3):331-340.
On Wittgenstein and James.S. K. Wertz - 1972 - New Scholasticism 46 (4):446-448.
The Philiosophy of Law of James Wilson.William T. Dillon - 1938 - New Scholasticism 12 (3):292-293.
The Radical Empiricism of William James.Paul Tibbetts - 1971 - New Scholasticism 45 (1):168-172.
William James and Maurice Blondel.Frederick J. D. Scott - 1958 - New Scholasticism 32 (1):32-44.
James Joyce and Humpty Dumpty.Donald Davidson - 1989 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
32 (#106,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Lire et Délire.Roland Houde - 1972 - Dialogue 11 (1):78-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references