Analyzability, ad hoc restrictions, and excessive flexibility of evidence-accumulation models: Reply to two critical commentaries

Psychological Review 121 (4):689-695 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"].Nicholas Humphrey - 2000 - Humphrey, Nicholas (2000) in Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"]. [Journal (Paginated)] 7 (4):98-112.
Truth in Evidence and Truth in Arguments Without Logical Omniscience.Gregor Betz - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1117-1137.
Standard Quantification Theory in the Analysis of English.Stephen Donaho - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):499-526.
Anomalies Persist, So Does the Problem of Harm.Philip Thomas, Pat Bracken & Sami Timimi - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (4):317-321.
On Accumulation of Information and Model Selection.Ido Erev - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):406-407.
Models, Representation, and Mediation.Tarja Knuuttila - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1260-1271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
2 (#1,392,405)

6 months
1 (#414,449)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references