Catholic Controversy Over the Rationale for the Determination of Death by Neurological Criteria

In Jason T. Eberl (ed.), Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary on "the incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria".John P. Lizza - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):pp. 393-395.
Brain Death and the US President's Council on Bioethics.Kevin McGovern - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (4):9.
Defining Death with Aristotle and Aquinas.Kevin Flannery - 2017 - In Jason T. Eberl (ed.), Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Challenges to the Determination of Death by Neurological Criteria.Tadeusz Pacholczyk & Stephen Hannan - 2019 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (4):583-599.
Determining death by neurological criteria: current practice and ethics.Matthew Hanley - 2020 - Philadelphia, PA: National Catholic Bioethics Center.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references