A constitutional critique on the regulations relating to artificial fertilisation of persons

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 10 (1):29-31 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is constitutionally impermissible for legislation to over-medicalise, that is, to legally enforce medical influence and supervision over certain actions, without good reason why such medical influence and supervision are required. Various parts of the regulations relating to artificial fertilisation of persons made in terms of the National Health Act over-medicalise aspects of artificial fertilisation and gamete donation. These offending parts of the regulations are accordingly unconstitutional and invalid. The article calls for a thorough review of the regulations from a constitutional perspective.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics briefing.Rebecca Mussell, Ranveig Svenning Berg & Allison Milbrath - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (2):147-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
10 (#1,222,590)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references