Philosophies of Touch: from Aristotle to Phenomenology

Research in Phenomenology 50 (3):300-316 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores Aristotle’s discovery of touch as the most universal and philosophical of the senses. It analyses his central insight in the De Anima that tactile flesh is a “medium not an organ,” unpacking both its metaphysical and ethical implications. The essay concludes with a discussion of how contemporary phenomenology—from Husserl to Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray—re-describes Aristotle’s seminal intuition regarding the model of “double reversible sensation.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Touch and Flesh in Aristotle’s de Anima.Rebecca Steiner Goldner - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.
Aristotle on Touch.Józef Bremer - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):73-87.
Aristotle on Touch.Józef Bremer - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):73-87.
Aristotle on the Unity of Touch.Mark A. Johnstone - 2021 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (1):23-43.
Touching Ground.Mladen Dolar - 2008 - Filozofski Vestnik 29 (2).
Aristotle on Knowledge and the Sense of Touch.Michael Golluber - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:655-680.
Aristotle on Knowledge and the Sense of Touch.Michael Golluber - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:655-680.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-24

Downloads
26 (#623,519)

6 months
3 (#1,020,910)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Kearney
Boston College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references