Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (3):349–366 (2004)

Authors
Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University
Abstract
Violation pornography is pornography where the depicted behavior includes unjust sexual acts, e.g., rape. In this paper I argue that it is unclear whether the enjoyment of violation pornography is bad for the viewer. My essay has three parts. First, I set out an account of flourishing. I adopt a composite account, whereby flourishing is a function of the degree to which an individual has pleasure and various objective-list elements. Objective-list elements are things (e.g., knowledge and meaningful relationships) that make my life go better independently of their effects on pleasure and desire-fulfillment. In the next two parts, I relate violation pornography to each component of flourishing. Thus, in the second part, I explore whether violation pornography promotes or hinders pleasure. In the third part I explore whether pornography is compatible with these objective-list elements, particularly virtue.
Keywords Pornography  Violation Pornography  Virtue  Well-Being  Flourishing  Vice  Rape Fantasy  Feminism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00237.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
121 ( #88,289 of 2,448,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #444,630 of 2,448,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes