Notes on Statius

Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):1-10 (1953)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Silvae of Statius have had good editing, in particular from Phillimore in the Oxford text. There is also the large commentary of Vollmer, which is very useful from the historical point of view, though not from the literary. But the most consistently valuable aid to the student seems to me to be the London Delphin edition of 1824, which not only gives most of the comments of the two best critics of Statius, N. Heinsius and Markland, but also offers the most consistently reliable translation of the work that I know.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notes on Statius.D. A. Slater - 1912 - The Classical Review 26 (08):255-258.
Two Notes on Statius, Thebaid.J. B. Poynton - 1953 - The Classical Review 3 (3-4):145-.
Notes on statius,thebaid2.Kyle Gervais - 2015 - Classical Quarterly 65 (1):411-414.
Notes on statius, thebaid 2.Kyle Gervais - 2015 - Classical Quarterly 65 (1):411-414.
Notes on Statius.Alan Ker - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):1-.
Two notes on Statius, Silvae iv. 1.J. H. Bishop - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (02):95-97.
Notes on Statius.Alan Ker - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (3-4):175-182.
The Codex Etonensis of Statius' Achilleid.O. A. W. Dilke - 1949 - Classical Quarterly 43 (1-2):45-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
15 (#945,692)

6 months
3 (#1,206,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references