Kant’ın Eleştirel Felsefesinde Özgürlükten Doğaya Geçişin İmk'nı Olarak Sanat

Felsefe Arkivi 50:31-41 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critique of the Power of Judgment is the third work of Kant’s critical philosophy. Kant states that he has put this work on paper to complement his critical philosophy. This statement of completion constitutes the transition that is required between the theoretical and practical areas of philosophy. According to Kant, transition from the theortical area, or natural area to the practical area, or the area of freedom is not possible. Moreover, principals in the area of freedom need to be realised in the area of nature. Kant has presented a system that establishes art as the bridge from the area of freedom to the area of nature. With regard to this system, genius is the skill that provides the rules for art through nature and as one definition of beautiful in Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant identifies beautiful as the transition of aesthetical ideas thorough genius. This transition occurs as a result of the judgment of taste by means of the free play of imagination and understanding. My aim in this study is to clarify how imagination that is not limited by understanding widens up and is presented as [non-conceptional] aestethical ideas through art. In order to put forth this representation with all its clarity, I will try to elucidate the meaning of the transition from the practical area of philosophy to its theoretical area, which is crucial according to Kant. In this contect, I wil emphasize the nature of judgments of taste, relation of nature-art, classification of fine arts, and the role of genius in emerging aestethical ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Ideality of Genius.Robert J. M. Neal - 2012 - Kant Studien 103 (3):351-360.
Form and expression in Kant's aesthetics.D. W. Gotshalk - 1967 - British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (3):250-260.
Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition.Paul Guyer - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):59-93.
Mutlak uzay-iliskisel uzay tartismalari baglaminda Kant'in uzay kavrayisi.Umut Morkoç - 2014 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 7 (1).
The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics.Rodolphe Gasché - 2002 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
The idea of form: rethinking Kant's aesthetics.Rodolphe Gasché - 2003 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
An Examination of Kant's Aesthetic Theory.Michael Livingston Mullen - 1980 - Dissertation, Vanderbilt University
A Poem is “Another Nature”: A Reading of Kant’s “Aesthetic Ideas”.Prashant Bagad - 2017 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (1):161-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-10

Downloads
8 (#1,299,968)

6 months
6 (#510,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references