In W. H. Newton-Smith (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Science. Blackwell. pp. 172-80 (1999)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Along with “paradigm” and “scientific revolution,” “incommensurability” is one of the three most influential expressions associated with the “new philosophy of science” first articulated in the early 1960s by Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. But, despite the fact that it has been widely discussed, opinions still differ widely as to the content and significance of the claim of incommensurability.
|
| Keywords | Natural Kinds Incommensurability Kuhn Feyerabend Scientific Revolutions |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Recent Work on Moral Revolutions.Michael Klenk, Elizabeth O’Neill, Chirag Arora, Charlie Blunden, Cecilie Eriksen, Jeroen Hopster & Lily Frank - forthcoming - Analysis.
Incommensurability in Cognitive Guise.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (1):29 – 43.
Similar books and articles
Incommensurability.Dudley Shapere - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 732-6.
Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds.Rachel Cooper - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):73-85.
The Problem of Processes and Transitions: Are Diseases Phase Kinds? [REVIEW]Stefan Dragulinescu - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-08-21
Total views
1,068 ( #5,522 of 2,498,794 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,566 of 2,498,794 )
2009-08-21
Total views
1,068 ( #5,522 of 2,498,794 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,566 of 2,498,794 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
