Incommensurability

In W. H. Newton-Smith (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Science. Blackwell. pp. 172-80 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Along with “paradigm” and “scientific revolution,” “incommensurability” is one of the three most influential expressions associated with the “new philosophy of science” first articulated in the early 1960s by Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. But, despite the fact that it has been widely discussed, opinions still differ widely as to the content and significance of the claim of incommensurability.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incommensurability.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2000 - In W. Newton-Smith (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 172–180.
The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories.Howard Sankey - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Melbourne
Incommensurability.Howard Sankey - 2005 - In Sahotra Sarkar & Jessica Pfeifer (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. New York: Routledge. pp. 370-373.
Against incommensurability.Michael Devitt - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):29-50.
Incommensurability.Harold I. Brown - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):3 – 29.
Incommensurability and Theory Change.Howard Sankey - 2010 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 456-474.
Incommensurability reconsidered.Harold I. Brown - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):149-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-21

Downloads
1,272 (#765)

6 months
83 (#197,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Muhammad Ali Khalidi
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references