Hume on the Ordinary Distinction Between Objective and Subjective Impressions

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):241-269 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume begins ‘Of scepticism with regard to the senses,’ Section 2 of the Treatise, Book I, Part iv with the claim that it is otiose to ask whether or not there are bodies since belief in their existence is unavoidable. The appropriate question is rather ‘What causes induce us to believe in the existence of body?’ (§2, 187-8; his emphasis). For Hume, belief is lively conception. Hence, he is also undertaking to answer the logically prior question: What causes induce us to form the concept of body? Hume wants to explain the ordinary notion of, and belief in, external objects as part of his science of human nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Hume's supposed rejection of resemblance between objects and impressions.Annemarie Butler - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2):257 – 270.
The distinction between coherence and constancy in Hume's Treatise I.iv.2.Tim Black - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):1-25.
The Metaphorics of Hume's Gendered Skepticism.Aaron Smuts - 2000 - In Anne Jaap Jacobson (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of David Hume. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hume's Natural History of Perception.Pje Kail - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):503 – 519.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
81 (#70,962)

6 months
22 (#694,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The distinction between coherence and constancy in Hume's Treatise I.iv.2.Tim Black - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):1-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
The Import of Hume's Theory of Time.Robert McRae - 1980 - Hume Studies 6 (2):119-132.
Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes.Jonathan Barnes - 1973 - Philosophical Quarterly 23 (90):73-76.
Hume on identity: A defense.Jim Stone - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 40 (2):275 - 282.

View all 7 references / Add more references