On the Interpretation of the Equation E = mc 2: Reply to Flores

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):215-216 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02698590600814449

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the Interpretation of the Equation E = mc 2: Response to Krajewski.Francisco Flores - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):217-218.
Władysław Krajewski, 1919–2006.Tomasz Bigaj - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):91 – 93.
Review of W. Krajewski and Władysław Krajewski: Correspondence Principle and Growth of Science. [REVIEW]Ron Yoshida - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):285-310.
Polish Essays in the Philosophy of the Natural Sciences. Wladyslaw Krajewski.Brent Mundy - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):166-167.
Professor Władysław Krajewski. His Philosophy and Life.Małgorzata Czarnocka - 2006 - Dialogue and Universalism 16 (3/4):159-163.
Wladyslaw Krajewski: Correspondence Principle and Growth of Science. [REVIEW]D. Wittich - 1980 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 28 (11):1421.
Derivation of Einstein's Equation, E= mc 2, from the Classical Force Laws.N. Hamdan, A. K. Hariri & J. López-Bonilla - 2007 - Apeiron 14 (4):435.
Interpretations of Einstein’s Equation E = mc 2.Francisco Flores - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245-260.
Władysław Krajewski, Konieczność, przypadek, prawo statystyczne (Necessity, Chance, Statistical Law). [REVIEW]Władysław Krajewski - 1979 - Dialectics and Humanism 6 (4):169-171.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc 2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
23 (#672,572)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the Interpretation of the Equation E = mc 2: Response to Krajewski.Francisco Flores - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):217-218.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Interpretations of Einstein’s Equation E = mc 2.Francisco Flores - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245-260.

Add more references