Nursing Ethics 20 (5):568-577 (2013)

Abstract
This study identified and described ethical problems encountered by physiotherapists in their practice and physiotherapists’ moral sensitivity in ethical situations. A questionnaire-based survey was constructed to identify ethical problems, and the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire Revised version was used to measure moral sensitivity. Physiotherapists (n = 116) working in public health services responded to the questionnaire. Based on the results, most of the physiotherapists encounter ethical problems weekly. They concern mainly financial considerations, equality and justice, professionalism, unethical conduct of physiotherapists or other professions and patients’ self-determination. The dimension of moral strength was emphasised in physiotherapists’ self-evaluations of their moral sensitivity. As a conclusion, ethical problems do occur not only at individual level but also at organisational and society level. Physiotherapists seem to have moral strength for speaking on behalf of the patient. Scarce resources make them feel insufficient but much could still be done to provide quality care in co-operation with other health-care professionals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0969733012468462
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Summary: What's Possible.James R. Rest & Darcia Narvaez - 1994 - In James R. Rest & Darcia Narváez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. L. Erlbaum Associates.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

See No Evil: Moral Sensitivity in the Formulation of Business Problems.Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (4):335-348.
The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics.Raymond De Vries - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):419 - 430.
Ethical Sensitivity: A Foundation for Moral Judgment.Suzy Jagger - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 8 (1):13-30.
The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics.Raymond De Vries - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):419-430.
Ethical Competence.K. Kulju, M. Stolt, R. Suhonen & H. Leino-Kilpi - 2016 - Nursing Ethics 23 (4):401-412.
A Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science.Henriikka Clarkeburn - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):439-453.
Auditors' Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems.Julia N. Karcher - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1033 - 1050.
Ethical Sensitivity: A Foundation for Moral Judgment.Suzy Jagger - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 8 (1):13-30.
10.5840/Jbee2011813.Suzy Jagger - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):13-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-19

Total views
37 ( #285,002 of 2,439,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,440 of 2,439,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes