Minerva 58 (1):115-137 (2020)

Authors
Thomas Duncan
University of South Carolina
Abstract
Notions of research quality are contextual in many respects: they vary between fields of research, between review contexts and between policy contexts. Yet, the role of these co-existing notions in research, and in research policy, is poorly understood. In this paper we offer a novel framework to study and understand research quality across three key dimensions. First, we distinguish between quality notions that originate in research fields and in research policy spaces. Second, drawing on existing studies, we identify three attributes considered important for ‘good research’: its originality/novelty, plausibility/reliability, and value or usefulness. Third, we identify five different sites where notions of research quality emerge, are contested and institutionalised: researchers themselves, knowledge communities, research organisations, funding agencies and national policy arenas. We argue that the framework helps us understand processes and mechanisms through which ‘good research’ is recognised as well as tensions arising from the co-existence of conflicting quality notions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11024-019-09385-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,287
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Is This Thing Called Science?A. F. Chalmers - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (3):393-404.
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1272-1283,.
The Republic of Science.Michael Polanyi - 1962 - Minerva 1 (1):54-73.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Quality in Clinical Research.Dorota Śwituła - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):147-156.
Alive and Well: The Research Imperative.Rebecca Dresser - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):915-921.
Political Control: A Way Forward for Educational Research?Stephen Gorard - 2002 - British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (3):378 - 389.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-26

Total views
7 ( #960,916 of 2,325,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #170,190 of 2,325,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes