On Norton’s dome

Synthese 190 (14):2925-2941 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Norton’s very simple case of indeterminism in classical mechanics has given rise to a literature critical of his result. I am interested here in posing a new objection different from the ones made to date. The first section of the paper expounds the essence of Norton’s model and my criticism of it. I then propose a specific modification in the absence of gravitational interaction. The final section takes into consideration a surprising consequence for classical mechanics from the new model introduced here

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-11

Downloads
69 (#230,964)

6 months
14 (#253,780)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Perez Laraudogoitia
University of the Basque Country

References found in this work

The Dome: An Unexpectedly Simple Failure of Determinism.John D. Norton - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):786-798.
Norton’s Slippery Slope.David B. Malament - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):799-816.
Determinism and the mystery of the missing physics.Mark Wilson - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):173-193.

View all 7 references / Add more references