Thinking tools: The fallacy of affirming the consequent: Law Thinking tools

Think 3 (7):31-32 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thinking Tools is a regular feature that introduces pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s1477175600000786

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Thinking tools: The genetic fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2006 - Think 5 (13):23-24.
Thinking Tools: The Sherlock Holmes Fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2008 - Think 6 (17-18):219-221.
Thinking tools: The relativist fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2005 - Think 3 (9):57-58.
Thinking tools: The lottery fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2005 - Think 4 (11):65-66.
Thinking tools: The gambler's fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2003 - Think 2 (5):51-52.
Thinking Tools: The prosecutor's Fallacy: Bebbington Thinking tools.Dene Bebbington - 2007 - Think 5 (14):107-108.
Thinking tools: Weak analogy: Law Thinking Tools.Stephen Law - 2007 - Think 5 (15):59-60.
Thinking tools. Fallacy: Division: Law thinking tools • folio.Stephen Law - 2009 - Think 8 (21):83-83.
Thinking tools. Fallacy: Two wrongs make a right: Law thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2008 - Think 7 (19):71-71.
Thinking tools: The genetic fallacy.Stephen Law - 2006 - Think 5 (13):23-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
10 (#1,205,838)

6 months
2 (#1,446,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references