Is lisbon the answer or the anathema to EC trade law and policy?

Abstract

The Lisbon Treaty tries to improve in efficiency and accountability in European Union (EU) trade policy-making. This paper recognizes the validity of the EU Member States' misgivings about giving too prominent a role to the European Commission. Have we now reached after the Lisbon Treaty reforms an adequate institutional balance in EC trade policy?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Decision‐Making Process.Bruno de Witte - 2015 - In Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 95–108.
EU Procedural Law.Andrea Biondi & Ravi Mehta - 2015 - In Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 153–165.
EU Competences.Paul Craig - 2015 - In Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 81–94.
European Constitutionalism v. Reformed Constitution for Europe.Vaidotas A. Vaicaitis - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):69-83.
EU Criminal Law.Valsamis Mitsilegas - 2015 - In Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 547–567.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#1,166,624)

6 months
4 (#862,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references