Two arguments for the etiological theory over the modal theory of biological function

Synthese 194 (4) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper contains a positive development and a negative argument. It develops a theory of function loss and shows how this undermines an objection raised against the etiological theory of function in support of the modal theory of function. Then it raises two internal problems for the modal theory of function

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-10

Downloads
81 (#70,962)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Maximilian Huber
University of Geneva
Brian Leahy
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Note on the Individuation of Biological Traits.Mihnea D. I. Capraru - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy 115 (4):215-221.
The Dilemma of Ahistorical Teleosemantics.Fabian Hundertmark - 2024 - Philosophy of Science 91 (1):58-71.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.
A philosophical guide to conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A counterexample to modus ponens.Vann McGee - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (9):462-471.

View all 16 references / Add more references