- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Pernicious Distinction Between Logic and Psychology
Tulane Studies in Philosophy 13:44-49 (1964)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Pernicious Distinction Between Logic and Psychology.Donald S. Lee - 1964 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 13:44-49.
Is the Distinction between Positive Actions and Omissions Value-Neutral?Douglas N. Husak - 1985 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 33:83-92.
Is the Distinction between Positive Actions and Omissions Value-Neutral?Douglas N. Husak - 1985 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 33:83-92.
The Difference Between the Psychology and the Epistemology of Perception.Max Hocutt - 1968 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 17:61-81.
Cultural Relativity and the Logic of Philosophy.James W. Dye - 1967 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 16:37-52.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
37 (#444,844)
6 months
1 (#1,516,021)
2011-01-09
Downloads
37 (#444,844)
6 months
1 (#1,516,021)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kftwx uwo