The Progress of Moral Evolution

Analyse & Kritik 41 (2):259-270 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Buchanan and Powell’s book is a valuable contribution to our understanding of the evolution of morality. I suggest that they exaggerate the degree to which their view of the evolution of moral progress is committed to a form of moral realism. I also suggest that Darwin’s own approach to the evolution of the moral sense shares more with their view than they may realise. Finally I point to some tensions in their invocation of the concept of the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness (EEA).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Progress and Evolution: Knowledge Versus Understanding.Eleonora Severini - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):87-105.
Evolutionary Moral Realism.John Collier & Michael Stingl - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (3):218-226.
How Moral Facts Cause Moral Progress.Andrés Luco - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (4):429-448.
The dynamics of moral progress.Julia Hermann - 2019 - Ratio 32 (4):300-311.
Reply to Comments.Russell Powell & Allen Buchanan - 2019 - Analyse & Kritik 41 (2):287-300.
Better than our nature.Michael Vlerick - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Is There Moral Progress?Eva Buddeberg - 2019 - Analyse & Kritik 41 (2):195-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-31

Downloads
16 (#934,061)

6 months
5 (#711,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Lewens
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references