Legal Punishment and the Public Identification of Offenders

Res Publica 24 (2):199-216 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the United States, the identities of criminal offenders are matters of public record, accessible to prospective employers, the press, and ordinary citizens. In European countries, the identities of offenders are routinely kept hidden, with some exceptions. The question addressed in this discussion concerns whether the public disclosure of the identities of offenders is part and parcel of their legal punishment. My contentions are that public disclosure is not conceptually part of legal punishment, necessary to serve substantive penal aims, or likely to enhance penal aims. At times, it will conflict with defensible aims of legal punishment. Other values might support or require the public identification of criminal offenders, but the aims of legal punishment do not appear to do so.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
8 (#517,646)

6 months
25 (#616,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Lippke
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Lockean Theory of Rights.A. John Simmons - 2020 - Princeton University Press.
Censure and Sanctions.Andrew Von Hirsch - 1996 - Oxford University Press UK.
Censure and Sanctions.Andrew Von Hirsch - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (4):407-415.
The right to threaten and the right to punish.Warren Quinn - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (4):327-373.

View all 12 references / Add more references