We report and compare the performance of different learning algorithms based on data from cortical recordings. The task is to predict the orientation of visual stimuli from the activity of a population of simultaneously recorded neurons. We compare several ways of improving the coding of the input (i.e., the spike data) as well as of the output (i.e., the orientation), and report the results obtained using different kernel algorithms.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
It is Not Evolution, but a Better Game Would Need a Better Agent.Christian Huyck & Ian Mitchell - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):499-500.
Selected Papers on Design of Algorithms.Donald Ervin Knuth - 2010 - Center for the Study of Language and Information.
How Experimental Algorithmics Can Benefit From Mayo's Extensions to Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing.Thomas Bartz-Beielstein - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):385 - 396.
Experiments on the Accuracy of Algorithms for Inferring the Structure of Genetic Regulatory Networks From Microarray Expression Levels.Joseph Ramsey & Clark Glymour - unknown
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #210,498 of 2,168,220 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,758 of 2,168,220 )
How can I increase my downloads?