The Firm as Association Versus the Firm as Commodity

Economics and Philosophy 4 (2):243 (1988)
Abstract
Recent years have seen the flowering of a new literature on the economic nature of firms marked by a concern with their internal organization and contractual characteristics. Related literatures on the principal-agent problem and the theory of financial markets have also contributed to a better understanding of firms as economic institutions. However, the place of the concept of the ownership of the firm is poorly developed in most of this literature, with many writers either ignoring the concept entirely or arguing that it is of no importance. The purpose of the present article is to point out that the concept of ownership of firms is crucial to an understanding of internal governance issues. Most economists implicitly presume that firms must be ownable and saleable if they are to be operated efficiently, and recently this viewpoint has been made more explicit by writers such as Jensen and Fama and Williamson. Their point of view is to some degree at odds with views of the firm as a coalition, which frequently appear in the same literature, and even more fundamentally in conflict with conceptions of the firm as an association or polity within which greater or lesser degrees of democracy in governance may be pursued. The first purpose of this article is to show that the incompletely articulated position of the leading authors on the economics of organization is that the firm is a commodity and must be so for purposes of efficiency
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267100001073
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A Preface to Economic Democracy.Robert H. Dahl (ed.) - 1985 - University of California Press.
On the Labor Theory of Property.David P. Ellerman - 1985 - Philosophical Forum 16 (4):293.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Survey Article: Justice in Production.Nien-hê Hsieh - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (1):72–100.
Marx and Disequilibrium.Louis Putterman - 1988 - Economics and Philosophy 4 (2):333.
What Is Complexity Science? A Possible Answer From Narrative Research.John T. Luhman & David M. Boje - 2001 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 3 (1):158-168.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Understanding Firm Response to Environmental Issues.Charles A. Backman, Brian Etienne & Brooke Matthews - 2010 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 21:163-174.
Country, Industry, and Firm-Level Influences on the Prevalence of Women on Corporate Boards.Johanne Grosvold & Stephen Brammer - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:261-277.
The Feminine Firm.John Dobson - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):227-232.
A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking.Kalle Pajunen - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):27-32.
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total downloads
11 ( #409,103 of 2,180,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #303,868 of 2,180,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums