It's good . . . But is it ART?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):336-336 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We applaud Norris et al.'s critical review of the literature on lexical effects in phoneme decision making, and we sympathize with their attempt to reconcile autonomous models of word recognition with current research. However, we suggest that adaptive resonance theory (ART) may provide a coherent account of the data while preserving limited inhibitory feedback among certain lexical and sublexical representations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hesitations and clarifications on a model to abandon feedback.Louisa M. Slowiaczek - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):347-347.
The trouble with merge: Modeling speeded target detection.Jonathan Grainger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-332.
Resonance within and between linguistic beings.Stephen D. Goldinger & Tamiko Azuma - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#947,808)

6 months
8 (#505,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references