Open Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):86-102 (2016)

Authors
Edward MacKinnon
California State University, Hayward
Abstract
This article probes the question of what interpretations of quantum mechanics actually accomplish. In other domains, which are briefly considered, interpretations serve to make alien systematizations intelligible to us. This often involves clarifying the status of their implicit ontology. A survey of interpretations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics supports the evaluation that these interpretations make a contribution to philosophy, but not to physics. Interpretations of quantum field theory are polarized by the divergence between the Lagrangian field theory that led to the Standard Model of Particle physics and the Algebraic quantum field theory, that discounts an ontology of particles. Ruetsche's interpretation, it is argued, offers a potential for loosening the sharp polarization that presently obtains. A brief evaluation focuses on the functional ontology of quantum field theory considered as an effective theory.
Keywords Interpretation, quantum mechanics, quantum field theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4236/ojpp.2016.61009
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Empirical Stance.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2002 - Yale University Press.
The Empirical Stance.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171-192.

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of a Posteriori Mathematics in Physics.Edward MacKinnon - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:166-175.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics?Louis Marchildon - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (10):1453-1466.
Whence Chemistry?Robert C. Bishop - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2):171-177.
Modern Physics and Problems of Knowledge.Paul M. Clark (ed.) - 1981 - Open University Press.
From Physics to Philosophy.Jeremy Butterfield & Constantine Pagonis (eds.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
On the Hypotheses Underlying Physical Geometry.J. Anandan - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (7-8):601-629.
Information, Physics, and Computation.Subhash C. Kak - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (1):127-137.
Quantum Uniqueness.Denis Sych & Gerd Leuchs - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (12):1613-1619.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-26

Total views
325 ( #22,011 of 2,344,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #18,123 of 2,344,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes