Fear Conditioning and Social Groups: Statistics, Not Genetics

Cognitive Science 33 (7):1232-1251 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Humans display more conditioned fear when the conditioned stimulus in a fear conditioning paradigm is a picture of an individual from another race than when it is a picture of an individual from their own race (Olsson, Ebert, Banaji, & Phelps, 2005). These results have been interpreted in terms of a genetic “preparedness” to learn to fear individuals from different social groups (Ohman, 2005; Olsson et al., 2005). However, the associability of conditioned stimuli is strongly influenced by prior exposure to those or similar stimuli. Using the Kalman filter, a normative statistical model, this article shows that superior fear conditioning to individuals from other groups is precisely what one would expect if participants perform optimal, Bayesian inference that takes their prior exposures to the different groups into account. There is therefore no need to postulate a genetic preparedness to learn to fear individuals from other races or social groups.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.David C. Knight, Hanh T. Nguyen & Peter A. Bandettini - 2006 - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 6 (2):157-162.
Natural selection and fear regulation mechanisms.Randolph M. Nesse & James L. Abelson - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):309-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
25 (#620,814)

6 months
7 (#592,600)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?