The general and the particular : politics, sex, and morality in Rousseau

Abstract

Rousseau's work often seems contradictory, but the author himself insists that his works comprise a consistent system based on the principle that man is naturally good. In order that individuals might live up to this natural goodness in society, Rousseau advocates a division of labour between general and particular aspects of reason. This division is exemplified in the different roles that Rousseau assigns to the sovereign and the government in the political sphere, and men and women in the domestic sphere. The difficulties faced by man in the absence of these divisions of labour are illustrated in Rousseau's autobiographical writings. When his various works are examined in light of the principle of man's natural goodness, the apparent contradictions between democratic and authoritarian aspects of his thought and between the roles his ascribes to men and women are resolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-22

Downloads
39 (#398,051)

6 months
2 (#1,445,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rousseau's Phallocratic Ends.Sarah Kofman & Mara Dukats - 1988 - Hypatia 3 (3):123-136.
Rousseau's Phallocratic Ends.Sarah Kofman & Mara Dukats - 1988 - Hypatia 3 (3):123 - 136.

Add more references