What do we directly hear? In section I, I define direct perception, and outline the logical atomist way of attacking the question. I argue in section II that atomism fails. Then, in sections III-V, I propose that a better alternative to atomism is to revive and modernize another traditional empiricist doctrine: that we directly sense what the senses deliver to automatic (i.e., sub-personal) processes of learning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Perceiving the Locations of Sounds.Casey O'Callaghan - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):123-140.
Anesthesia and the Electrophysiology of Auditory Consciousness.Susan Pockett - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):45-61.
Seeing and Hearing Directly.Hannes Ole Matthiessen - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):91-103.
Vocal Gestures and Auditory Objects.Josef P. Rauschecker - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):143-144.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-09
Total downloads8 ( #490,875 of 2,168,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?