Commentary: How much should lawyers know when picking a jury?

Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (2):2-54 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0731129x.2005.9992183

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

To What Should Lawyers Be Faithful?Alice Woolley - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (2):124-136.
Commentary: Why drug legalization should be opposed.Charles B. Rangel - 1998 - Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (2):2-2.
Expanding the Jury: A Provocative Proposal.Nancy S. Marder - 2016 - Criminal Justice Ethics 35 (1):68-79.
The selling of jury deliberations.John Kleinig - 1989 - Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (1):26-26.
Commentary: Why we should establish a police code of ethics.Hubert Williams - 1992 - Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):2-100.
Commentary: Leadership is the key to ethical practice in criminal justice agencies.Kevin N. Wright - 1999 - Criminal Justice Ethics 18 (2):2-69.
Rebalancing the criminal justice process: Ethical challenges for criminal defence lawyers.Ed Cape - 2006 - Legal Ethics 9 (1):56-79.
Commentary: Tales of a criminal justice reformer.Marc Mauer - 1996 - Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (1):2-87.
When police should say “no!” to gratuities.Stephen Coleman - 2004 - Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (1):33-44.
Commentary: Criminal record rides again.Andrew von Hirsch - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):2-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
26 (#597,650)

6 months
10 (#383,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references