Lavoisier, Priestley and the Philosophes: Epistemic and Linguistic Dimensions to the Chemical Revolution

Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 8:91-98 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Electricity, Knowledge, and the Nature of Progress in Priestley's Thought.John G. McEvoy - 1979 - British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1):1-30.
Priestley and Lavoisier.John G. Mcevoy - 2007 - Annals of Science 64 (4):595-605.
Lavoisier's Early Career in Science: An Examination of Some New Evidence.J. B. Gough - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1):52-57.
Chemistry, a lingua philosophica.Guillermo Restrepo & José L. Villaveces - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (3):233-249.
Viewing chemistry through its ways of classifying.Wolfgang Lefèvre - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):25-36.
The conceptual structure of the chemical revolution.Paul Thagard - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):183-209.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Research schools of chemistry from Lavoisier to Wurtz.Maurice Crosland - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Science 36 (3):333-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John McEvoy
University of Cincinnati

Citations of this work

On the neglect of the philosophy of chemistry.J. van Brakel - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (2):111-174.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references