Euclidean space: A lasting philosophical obsession

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):185-191 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant and the Impossibility of Non‐Euclidean Space.Tufan Kıymaz - 2019 - Philosophical Forum 50 (4):485-491.
Two Interpretations of Binocular Visual Space: Hyperbolic and Euclidean.Tarow Indow - 1967 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):51-64.
Philosophical Problems of Space and Time.[author unknown] - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):253-256.
Space, Time and Motion, a Philosophical Introduction.Wesley C. Salmon - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):189-194.
Euclides ab omni naevo vindicatus.J. R. Lucas - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-11.
Why the Weyl Tile Argument is Wrong.Lu Chen - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
276 (#76,410)

6 months
18 (#152,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

It ain’t necessarily so.Hilary Putnam - 1962 - Journal of Philosophy 59 (22):658-671.
Euclides ab omni naevo vindicatus.J. R. Lucas - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-11.

Add more references