Kein Vorrang für Gleichheit

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 95 (3):384-394 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The presumption in favour of equality is the main argument pro egalitarianism so far. It assigns equality an extraordinary epistemic role: equality would not require special reason, only inequality would do so. The paper examines (and dismisses) five important arguments in favour of the presumption and presents two general objections against it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Presumption of Equality.Cynthia Stark - 2018 - Law. Ethics and Philosophy 6:7-27.
Hegels Begriff des sittlichen Staates und seine egalitaristischen Konsequenzen.Nele Schneidereit - 2011 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 97 (1):107-124.
Parfit's Leveling down Argument against Egalitarianism.Ben Saunders - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 251–253.
Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?Aveek Bhattacharya - 2014 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 5.
Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?Aveek Bhattacharya - 2012 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 5:4-15.
Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?Aveek Bhattacharya - 2012 - Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric 5:4-15.
Index.John Broome - 1991 - In Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 251–255.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-05

Downloads
6 (#1,479,581)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references