Relevance Logics, Paradoxes Of Consistency And The K Rule Ii

Logic and Logical Philosophy 15:175-191 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The logic B+ is Routley and Meyer’s basic positive logic. Wedefine the logics BK+ and BK′+ by adding to B+ the K rule and to BK+the characteristic S4 axiom, respectively. These logics are endowed witha relatively strong non-constructive negation. We prove that all the logicsdefined lack the K axiom and the standard paradoxes of consistency

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relevance logics and intuitionistic negation.José M. Méndez & Gemma Robles - 2008 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 18 (1):49-65.
Negation introduced with the unary connective.Gemma Robles - 2009 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 19 (3):371-388.
Modal logics with Belnapian truth values.Serge P. Odintsov & Heinrich Wansing - 2010 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 20 (3):279-304.
A constructive negation for logics including TW+.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2005 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 15 (4):389-404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gemma Robles
Universidad de León
José M. Méndez
Universidad de Salamanca

Citations of this work

A plea for KR.Alison Duncan Kerr - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3047-3071.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references