Theory and Decision 55 (1):45-57 (2003)
The possibility to interpret expected and nonexpected utility theories in purely probabilistic terms has been recently investigated. Such interpretation proposes as guideline for the Decision Maker the comparison of random variables through their probability to outperform a stochastic benchmark. We apply this type of analysis to the model of Becker and Sarin, showing that their utility functional may be seen as the probability that an opportune random variable, depending on the one to be evaluated, does not outperform a non-random benchmark. Further, the consequent choice criterion is equivalent to a sort of probability of ruin. Possible interpretations and financial examples are discussed
|Keywords||benchmarking choice criteria lottery-dependent utility nonexpected utility theory probability of ruin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Applying the Benchmarking Procedure: A Decision Criterion of Choice Under Risk. [REVIEW]Francesca Beccacece & Alessandra Cillo - 2006 - Theory and Decision 61 (1):75-91.
Similar books and articles
Lottery Dependent Utility: A Reexamination.Ulrich Schmidt - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (1):35-58.
Stochastic Choice and Consistency in Decision Making Under Risk: An Experimental Study.Barry Sopher & J. Mattison Narramore - 2000 - Theory and Decision 48 (4):323-349.
Convex Stochastic Dominance with Finite Consequence Sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.
When Coherent Preferences May Not Preserve Indifference Between Equivalent Random Variables: A Price for Unbounded Utilities.Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark Schervish & Joseph Kadane - unknown
Revealed Preference and Expected Utility.Stephen A. Clark - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):159-174.
Under Stochastic Dominance Choquet-Expected Utility and Anticipated Utility Are Identical.Peter Wakker - 1990 - Theory and Decision 29 (2):119-132.
Prospect Relativity: How Choice Options Influence Decision Under Risk.Neil Stewart, Nick Chater, Henry P. Stott & Stian Reimers - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):23.
Coherent Choice Functions Under Uncertainty.Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish & Joseph B. Kadane - 2009 - Synthese 172 (1):157 - 176.
Preference for Equivalent Random Variables: A Price for Unbounded Utilities.Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish & Joseph B. Kadane - unknown
Random Behavior and the as-If Defense of Rational Choice Theory in Demand Experiments.Ivan Moscati & Paola Tubaro - unknown
Positivity of Bid-Ask Spreads and Symmetrical Monotone Risk Aversion.Moez Abouda & Alain Chateauneuf - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (2):149-170.
Even Risk-Averters May Love Risk.Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (1):81-99.
Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty.George Wu - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (2):159-199.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads31 ( #165,470 of 2,168,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,721 of 2,168,640 )
How can I increase my downloads?