Commentary on James B. Freeman: “The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Bias”

()
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2016

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to commentary on "The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Bias".James B. Freeman - unknown
The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Boas.B. Freeman James - unknown
Commentary on Moldovan.Jim Gough - unknown
Reply to commentary on "Ethical argumentation, objectivity, and bias".Derek Allen - unknown
Commentary on "Mapping objectivity and bias in relation to argument".Justine M. Kingsbury - unknown
James B. Freeman,dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments. A theory of argument structure.Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):319-321.
Commentary on T. Herman’s “Revising Toulmin’s Model: Argumentative Cell and the Bias of Objectivity”.S. W. Patterson - unknown
Commentary on Daniel Cohen and Katharina Stevens' "Virtuous Vices: On Objectivity and Bias in Argumentation".Tone Kvernbekk - unknown
James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises. [REVIEW]David Hitchcock - 2007 - Philosophical Inquiry 29 (1-2):168-175.
Review: Charles B. Daniels, James B. Freeman, Gerald W. Charlwood, Toward an Ontology of Number, Mind and Sign. [REVIEW]Linda Wetzel - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1102-1104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-20

Downloads
21 (#173,985)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrei Moldovan
Universidad de Salamanca

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references