A Cantorian argument against infinitesimals

Synthese 133 (3):305 - 330 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1887 Georg Cantor gave an influential but cryptic proof of theimpossibility of infinitesimals. I first give a reconstruction ofCantor's argument which relies mainly on traditional assumptions fromEuclidean geometry, together with elementary results of Cantor's ownset theory. I then apply the reconstructed argument to theinfinitesimals of Abraham Robinson's nonstandard analysis. Thisbrings out the importance for the argument of an assumption I call theChain Thesis. Doubts about the Chain Thesis are seen to render thereconstructed argument inconclusive as an attack on the infinitelysmall.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#210,565)

6 months
10 (#383,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
To Continue With Continuity.Martin Cooke - 2005 - Metaphysica 6 (2):91-109.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Non-standard Analysis.Gert Heinz Müller - 2016 - Princeton University Press.
Completeness in the theory of types.Leon Henkin - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):81-91.
Computability and Logic.G. S. Boolos & R. C. Jeffrey - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):95-95.
Completeness in the Theory of Types.Leon Henkin - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):72-73.
[Omnibus Review].Robert Goldblatt - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):225-227.

View all 8 references / Add more references