Three Futures: Nightmare, Diversion, Vision

World Futures 74 (2):51-67 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Possible futures can, for simplicity, be reduced to three broad options: “Business-as-usual economic growth”, “Green economic growth”, and “Ecological sustainability”. We critically discuss the feasibility and sustainability of each. We find that the Nightmare option will eventually be undermined by ecological deterioration and rising resource scarcity, while the Diversion option, we argue, is doomed to failure. The Vision option is for us the only viable future, but requires unprecedented socioeconomic changes. Regardless of path, either Earth biophysical changes, or socioeconomic changes—or possibly both—will be unprecedented. Hence, predicting the future, never easy, will become much harder.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pursuitworthiness in the scheme of futures.Veli Virmajoki - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (1):1-26.
Integrating interiority in community development.Gail Hochachka - 2005 - World Futures 61 (1 & 2):110 – 126.
Governance barriers to sustainability.Richard Lamm - 2003 - World Futures 59 (3 & 4):275 – 285.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-02

Downloads
22 (#733,109)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Population Bomb. Res - 1994 - Ethics and Medics 19 (9):3-4.

Add more references