Utilitarianism, Institutions, and Justice

Philosophical Review 109 (1):135 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Utilitarianism is subject to objections of at least three kinds: It is wrong about the nature of the fundamental property in virtue of which wrong acts are wrong. It is self-defeating in the sense that acting as it requires will actually undermine the goal of maximization. The acts it requires are, intuitively, wrong. In the book under review, Bailey replies to objections of all three kinds, but especially to the third.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Utilitarianism, institutions, and justice.William Nelson - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):135-138.
Utilitarianism, institutions, and justice.James Wood Bailey - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Progressive consequentialism.Dale Jamieson & Robert Elliot - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):241-251.
Optimific, Right, But Not Obligatory.R. Attfield - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):317-320.
Optimific, Right, but Not Obligatory.R. Attfield - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):317 - 320.
Scanlon’s Contractualism.Robert Merrihew Adams - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):563-586.
A Minimalist Ethic of Duty.Phillip Goggans - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:431-436.
A Minimalist Ethic of Duty.Phillip Goggans - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:431-436.
Is government supererogation possible?Justin Weinberg - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):263-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
51 (#304,185)

6 months
18 (#191,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references