Critique of Security

McGill-Queen's University Press (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Challenging the common assumption that security is an unquestionable good, Neocleous explores the ways in which security has been used in the service of a vision of social order in which state power and liberal subjectivity become an integral part of human experience. Treating security as a political technology for liberal order-building and engaging with a wide range of thinkers and subject areas - security studies and international political economy; history, law, and political theory; international relations and historical sociology - Neocleous explores the ways in which individuals, classes, and the state have been shaped and ordered according to a logic of security. In so doing, he uncovers the violence that underlies the politics of security, the ideological links between security and emergency powers, and the fetish for security that is dominating modern politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
6 (#1,484,933)

6 months
3 (#1,045,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Regimes of Violence and the Trias Violentiae.Willem Schinkel - 2013 - European Journal of Social Theory 16 (3):310-325.
The Fascist Moment: Security, Exclusion, Extermination.Mark Neocleous - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (1):23-37.
Ethics of security: A genealogical introduction.Andrea Rossi - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):48-71.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references